Model Minority & Associates

An interview with Prof. Peter Huang

Like all attorneys, Asian-American lawyers strive for legal excellence by honing their expertise and delivering quality client service. Yet, they often confront a myriad of stereotypes, biases, and misconceptions from colleagues and even clients. In this interview, Prof. Peter Huang of Colorado Law delves into the unique challenges and biases Asian-American lawyers face.

Prof. Huang discusses how many view Asian-American lawyers through the lens of the "model minority" myth. This stereotype paints Asian-Americans as a monolithic group, emphasizing traits such as studiousness, diligence, and obedience, and overlooking their diverse individual qualities. Such perceptions can have detrimental effects. Aspiring Asian-American leaders or law partners may find themselves pigeonholed as effective but potentially lacking creativity or vision, consequently limiting their ascent to senior roles.

To give context, Prof. Huang examines notable historical examples of institutional biases against Asians in the U.S., notably citing the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. This federal law, unique in its explicit targeting, suspended Chinese immigration and declared Chinese immigrants ineligible for naturalization. Prof. Huang also references the Supreme Court's 1944 Korematsu decision, which sanctioned the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. While such glaring acts of state discrimination have diminished, Prof. Huang emphasizes that today's Asian-American lawyers still wrestle with more subtle, often unspoken or subconscious biases. He further enriches the discussion by introducing concepts like the “perpetual foreigner syndrome” or the minority “cloak of invisibility” shedding light on multifaceted challenges Asian-American professionals encounter.


  • Attorney CLE accreditation 

Disrupting Racism: Essays by an Asian American Prodigy Professor (2023) – a book by Professor Huang exploring how racism's devastating impact on individuals, communities, and societies be prevented 

Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) – The first and only major law explicitly restricting immigration based on a single nationality.

Korematsu v. United States (1944) – Established that the internment of Japanese American citizens during wartime was constitutional

Additional Scholarly Articles by Prof. Huang

Prof. Nathalie Martin discusses A Mindful Practice (Part 2)
A Mindful Practice (Part 2)
Prof. Lenni Benson discusses Lawyers without Papers - Immigration and Legal Ethics
Lawyers without Papers - Immigration and Legal Ethics
Prof. Anthony Sebok discusses Legal Innovation – Investing in Lawsuits
Legal Innovation – Investing in Lawsuits
Prof. Anthony Sebok discusses Legal Innovation – Investing in Lawsuits (Part 2)
Legal Innovation – Investing in Lawsuits (Part 2)
Jennifer Justice discusses RocJustice - Law of Hip-Hop
RocJustice - Law of Hip-Hop
Brian Cuban discusses The Addicted Lawyer - A Profession in Crisis
The Addicted Lawyer - A Profession in Crisis
Brian Cuban discusses The Addicted Lawyer - A Profession in Crisis (Part 2)
The Addicted Lawyer - A Profession in Crisis (Part 2)
Brian Cuban discusses The Addicted Lawyer - A Profession in Crisis (Part 3)
The Addicted Lawyer - A Profession in Crisis (Part 3)
Prof. Carrie Menkel-Meadow discusses The Ethical Limits of Negotiations
The Ethical Limits of Negotiations
Prof. Carrie Menkel-Meadow discusses The Ethical Limits of Negotiations (Part 2)
The Ethical Limits of Negotiations (Part 2)
Prof. Leslie Levin discusses The Malpractice Insurance Dilemma (Prior)
The Malpractice Insurance Dilemma (Prior)
Jon Krop discusses The Mindful Lawyer
The Mindful Lawyer
Jon Krop discusses The Mindful Lawyer (Part 2)
The Mindful Lawyer (Part 2)
Profs Bruce Green & Rebecca Roiphe discusses The Power of the Prosecutor (Part 2)
The Power of the Prosecutor (Part 2)