Press Freedom vs. Privacy (Part 2)

An interview with Prof. Amy Gajda

The First Amendment provides broad but not absolute freedom of press protections. Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren first famously articulated the right to privacy in 1890, a “right to be let alone” from undue prying by the press in private matters. While historically the press has enjoyed considerable latitude in determining what is newsworthy and publishable, there have been recent movements in the courts to constrict press freedoms and broaden individual privacy rights. Professor Amy Gajda of Tulane Law School examines how the concept of newsworthiness has evolved and what happens to press freedoms when “quasi-journalists,” self-publishers, bloggers and the like who don’t abide by traditional ethics codes overstep the editorial line.

 

Watch Part 1 of Press Freedom vs. Privacy.

 


  • Attorney CLE accreditation 

Judge Andrew Napolitano discusses Domestic Spying and the NSA
Domestic Spying and the NSA
Prof. Jeffrey Rosen discusses Government Surveillance: Privacy & Technology
Government Surveillance: Privacy & Technology
Hina Shamsi discusses Military Drones and Targeted Killing
Military Drones and Targeted Killing
Prof. Daniel Capra discusses Police Power and Personal Rights
Police Power and Personal Rights
Prof. Daniel Capra discusses Police Power and Personal Rights (Part 2)
Police Power and Personal Rights (Part 2)
Scott Skinner-Thompson discusses Sexual Privacy and Government "Outing"
Sexual Privacy and Government "Outing"